An analysis of the national crime victimization survey on effectiveness of armed victim resistance

It would be useful to know how large a fraction of crimes with direct offender-victim contact result in a DGU. The same would be true of laws which ban gun carrying. These findings are consistent with the view that crime circumstances likely to appear more dangerous to victims are more likely to push victims into using guns.

This is also too serious a matter to base conclusions on silly statistics comparing the number of lives taken with guns with the number of criminals killed by victims.

Are these estimates plausible? Many of the findings in Table 4 are unsurprising. Similarly, gun defenders were no more likely than other people to endorse the view that the courts do not deal harshly enough with criminals.

Loftin and Mackenzie reported that rapes might be thirty-three times as frequent as NCVS estimates indicate, while spousal violence could easily be twelve times as high. If this is so, then forceful actions taken by victims are easier to see as genuinely and largely defensive.

It should be emphasized that these are just stated perceptions of participants, not objective assessments of actual probabilities. The lack of such detail raises the possibility that the guns were not actually "used" in any meaningful way.

These patterns are all presumably due to the higher rates of crime victimization among minorities, big city dwellers, and single persons. That is, forty-eight independent samples of residential telephone numbers were drawn, one from each of the lower forty-eight states, providing forty-eight independent, albeit often small, state samples.

By this time there seems little legitimate scholarly reason to doubt that defensive gun use is very common in the U. Estimates using all of the DGU cases are labelled herein as "A" estimates, while the more conservative estimates based only on cases devoid of any problematic indications are labelled "B" estimates.

Bureau of Justice Statistics, supra note 26, at31, Nevertheless, having access to a gun and being willing to use it against criminals is not the same as actually doing so.

Thus, there is no support for the speculation that gun defenders do well merely because of other advantageous crime circumstances associated with defensive gun use.

These are discussed in greater detail elsewhere. For confrontational burglarly, attacking with a gun had the second lowest loss rate of sixteen self-protection measures, bested only by another mode of armed self-protection, threatening the offender with a nongun weapon.

This sort of bland and spurious even-handedness is misleading.Start studying CJST Ch 2. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.

Gary Kleck

(UCR/NIBRS), who among the following is a victim of robbery? A. Maria, who is forced to handover her jewelry at gun point Which of the following crimes is least likely to be reported in the National Crime Victimization Survey.

How To Conduct Victimization Surveys: A Workbook Prepared for: I am pleased that we in PD&R are making the sophisticated methodology of victim surveys available to The questionnaires to be used for this evaluation have been adapted from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) specifically for the purposes of this comparative.

Jun 19,  · But an analysis of five years' worth of stats collected by the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics' National Crime Victimization Survey puts the number much, much lower — about 67, times a year.

Gary Kleck (born March 2, the frequency and effectiveness of defensive gun use by crime victims, patterns of gun ownership, (DGU - the use of guns for self-protection), compared to about million gun crimes as estimated by the National Crime Victimization Survey.

- The Inaccuracy of National Crime Victimization Survey Research However consistent the evidence may be concerning the effectiveness of armed victim resistance, there are some who minimize its significance by insisting that it is rare.[15]. Florida State University criminologist, Gary Kleck, analyzed data from the Department of Justice's National Crime Victimization Survey ().

Describing his findings on defensive gun use, in Armed: New Perspectives on Gun Control, New York:Prometheus Books (), Kleck writes.

An analysis of the national crime victimization survey on effectiveness of armed victim resistance
Rated 3/5 based on 1 review